Converging paths on grassy hillside

How early tax input improves outcomes in carve-outs

Related topics

Three actions companies should take to avoid surprises with carve-outs.


In brief

  • Tax accounting for a separation of a part of a business is often highly complex and can directly impact valuation, deal economics and the separation and day-one tax profile.
  • Companies can take practical steps to reduce tax surprises and support a successful separation and smoother transition to standalone or integrated operations.

“Carve‑outs,” or the sale or separation of a part of a business, are a common feature of today’s mergers and acquisitions and divestiture environment. While carve-outs can unlock value and sharpen strategic focus, for most companies, carve-outs are nonroutine transactions that introduce significant complexities and challenges to financial and tax reporting that are often underestimated.

Evaluating the tax implications of a carve‑out early in the transaction lifecycle can help avoid surprises, enable more confident decisions and unlock incremental transaction value.

A carve‑out occurs when a company separates part of its business from the broader organization. The carved‑out business may be sold, spun-off or prepared to operate as a standalone entity.

Companies pursue carve‑outs for many reasons: shifting market conditions, changing customer demand or a desire to focus on core operations. In diversified groups, carve‑outs are often driven by value creation – individual business units may be worth more on their own than when embedded in a larger organization.

 

Why does tax accounting matter in a carve‑out?

 

Tax accounting plays an important role in how a carved‑out business is valued and ultimately separated from its parent.

 

Unlike a standalone company, a carved‑out business typically does not have its own historical legal, accounting or tax structure. The income tax positions and tax attributes of the carve-out business often are embedded not only in a wider consolidated group, but within various legal entities within a group. As a result, the income tax provision, tax attributes and even cash taxes must be allocated to the carve‑out business — frequently for the first time.

 

These allocations impact carve-out financial statements, affecting the economics of the transaction and potentially the resulting “day-one” tax profile of the carve-out business. Tax accounting for a carve-out business is especially complex for several reasons:

 

  • No single standardized approach: Accounting guidance for carve-outs does not exist in a single standard under either US GAAP or IFRS. Instead, companies must look within multiple applicable standards, including ASC 740 or IAS 12. Tax accounting for a carve-out requires companies to apply considerable judgment when allocating taxes, often across multiple jurisdictions, for multiple reporting periods.
  • Shared structures and systems: Tax filings, legal entities and intercompany arrangements are designed for the existing consolidated group and entities, not for standalone reporting. Companies must determine the results of the carve-out business within the historical legal and tax structure, requiring judgment on how to isolate the tax impacts of the carve-out business from the wider group. Routinely, determining the results of the carve-out business requires re-calculating historical results on a hypothetical basis, as if the carve-out business operated separately. Recalculation, however, does not entail recasting the historical business into a new structure or form – hence the need for judgment on how to reflect the historical results of the carve-out business that is co-mingled within an existing group.
  • Pro forma adjustments: Sellers often make pro forma adjustments to carve-out financial statements to account for certain anticipated differences between the actual historical results of the carve-out business and the anticipated comparable results of the carve-out as a standalone business. For example, a pro forma adjustment may be made to account for financing cost the carve-out business anticipates as a standalone business that is not reflected in the historical results of the carve-out business. When accounting for pro forma adjustments, companies must also consider the tax impacts of such adjustments.
  • Increased scrutiny: Carve-out financial statements often are subject to a lower materiality threshold than the consolidated group. Combining lower materiality with inherently higher subjectivity in the compilation of carve-out financial statements often results in heightened scrutiny from buyers, regulators and financial statement auditors. Attention to detail and alignment of pre-tax and tax judgments are critical to compiling quality carve-out financial statements that satisfy stakeholder expectations.

 

Key considerations in carve‑out tax accounting

 

When done well, carve‑out tax accounting can improve outcomes. High-quality carve-out tax accounting can support higher confidence in valuation, clearer communication with buyers and investors, fewer surprises during diligence and post‑close, and a smoother path to accounting and reporting for separation, remaining operations and standalone operations.

 

In many cases, strong tax accounting also helps organizations better understand the carve-out “perimeter” and true performance of the carve‑out business. Here are three actions companies should take to improve outcomes for carve-out tax accounting:

 

  1. Start with a comprehensive financial analysis and monitor market conditions: Preparation of carve‑out financial statements starts with having a deep understanding of the historical business — legal, tax, transfer pricing, treasury, accounting, unique and discrete events, etc. — to ensure a proper definition of the carve-out business “perimeter” and transactions to be included in the carve-out financial statements. 

    Political, policy and regulatory developments, as well as macroeconomics, interest rates and capital market dynamics all influence the market and timing for divestitures. Personnel responsible for tax accounting and reporting should remain aware of potential strategic transactions that could require urgent attention and reprioritize resources. Often the “window of opportunity” for a divestiture is small, requiring intense, accelerated efforts to complete a transaction with limited lead time.

  2. Inform stakeholders and involve professionals: For most organizations, a carve‑out transaction is a unique transaction that recurring accounting processes and procedures are not designed to address. Understanding the scope and timing of a carve-out transaction, developing an awareness of potential tax technical, tax accounting and financial reporting issues, informing key stakeholders of such issues and involving professionals to address such issues are important to managing tax risks and achieving transaction success.

  3. Plan for post-separation tax reporting: Tax accounting and reporting do not end at the completion of the carve-out transaction. The completion of the transaction will impact the ongoing tax accounting and reporting for the remaining group. Companies should assess the efficacy of tax processes, procedures and controls to ensure changes in legal and tax structure, data, systems and personnel are considered and updates made as needed. Companies also should consider and plan for treasury flows, one-time tax filings and unique tax technical issues related to a divestiture – all of which can influence tax consequences of the divestiture and the continuing operations of the remaining group.

    For the carve-out business, if a new standalone group, the business will need to operate on its own, designing and implementing processes and controls to enable standalone reporting, including completing financial reporting and tax compliance as a standalone group. If the carve-out business was acquired by an existing group, the acquiring group will need to integrate the carve-out into its tax accounting and reporting framework, without delaying ongoing financial reporting timelines.

Summary

Carve‑outs offer a powerful way for organizations to unlock value and realign strategy. Carve-out transactions, however, are rarely simple – especially from a tax accounting perspective. By addressing tax considerations early, engaging the right professionals and planning for operations post-separation, investors and executives can avoid surprises and improve transaction outcomes.

Related content

How the ‘side-by-side’ minimum tax accord will reshape global policy

The side-by-side arrangement reshapes global tax competition, signaling a shift from alignment to coexistence. Learn what it means for business.

BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two: the latest OECD releases – first impressions

In this webcast, panelists discuss insights on recent developments in the side-by-side system and permanent safe harbor. Learn more.

How to alleviate BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two data challenges

Advanced data aggregation tools can help with BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two compliance. Read our insights to stay compliant and reduce risks. Learn more.

About this article

Authors