NIL rights and new fraud risks for collegiate athletes
In recent years, collegiate athletics has undergone a dramatic transformation. Landmark changes — including a Supreme Court case, high-profile settlements and numerous states passing new legislation — now allow athletes to receive direct compensation, ushering in new opportunities and risks. With annual revenues and athlete valuations soaring, schools, athletes and stakeholders are navigating a patchwork of evolving regulations and oversight. The rapid growth of NIL collectives and media partnerships has fueled concerns about pay-for-play and exposed athletes to the types of fraud schemes previously limited to professional athletes.
As college athletes gain national visibility and market their NILs, universities are restructuring support systems, but these changes also open the door to the same threats and fraudulent opportunities seen at the highest levels of sports. Companies have now formed apps and websites that allow athletes to accept payments for promotion on social media. In many cases, college athletes are promoting products or businesses without much, if any, due diligence. While these changes may support student athletes, they also expose them to the same risks — fraud, identity theft and exploitation — that have long plagued professionals.
The expanding threat spectrum: Common sports fraud schemes targeting athletes and teams today
Athletes today are confronted with an expanding array of threats as perpetrators continually devise new ways to exploit their trust and relationships. These risks include not only traditional fraudulent schemes — such as rigged poker tournaments, extortion, embezzlement, identity theft and misappropriation of earnings — but also newer forms of malfeasance, like sports betting fraud and unauthorized use of NIL. Physical safety concerns, including stalking, harassment, break-ins and robberies have intensified as athletes’ public profiles and compensation have grown. A common thread runs through these cases — fraudsters often gain access by leveraging personal relationships or posing as trusted professionals, then capitalize on limited oversight and the complexity of athletes’ financial affairs. The steady inflow of substantial earnings can mask improper outflows and fraudulent investments, allowing schemes to go undetected.
We’ve identified the following recurring patterns:
- Individuals posing as financial professionals to misappropriate funds for personal gain
- Unauthorized and overly risky investments made by representatives, often with undisclosed conflicts of interest
- Unauthorized use or misappropriation of earnings and cash by trusted parties — including representatives or family members — for personal expenses or cash withdrawals
- Exploitation of NIL — both authorized and unauthorized
- False advice and undisclosed conflicts from representatives
Beyond financial loss, athletes face intensifying physical and digital security threats. High-profile cases — including break-ins at the homes of athletes — underscore the risks that come with increased public profiles and compensation. The proliferation of social media has further amplified these dangers, with at least 52 stalking cases since 2020 and a surge in online abuse and harassment.12 The rise of lucrative NIL deals and heightened visibility for collegiate athletes have brought these risks into the college arena, emphasizing the importance of proactive security measures and intelligence capabilities for teams and leagues.