Reserve pressures, portfolio maturity and rising demand are reshaping how operators compete and create value.


In brief

  • US oil and gas producers maintained strong production and operational performance in 2025 despite weaker commodity prices and growing market uncertainty.
  • As reserve replacement becomes more challenging, operational performance, integration and capital efficiency are increasingly important differentiators.
  • Natural gas demand, maturing portfolios and evolving growth strategies are reshaping how operators position for the next phase of value creation.

Regina Balderas, EY-Parthenon Americas Oil & Gas and Chemicals Sector Leader and Matt Melnar, EY Americas Oil & Gas and Chemicals Assurance Leader also contributed to this article.

Entering the second half of the year, the US oil & gas and chemicals sector seems to be living by the adage of “doing well by doing good.” The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has interrupted 20% of global crude and liquefied natural gas (LNG) flows, and it has disrupted the world economy’s supply of petrochemicals and other critical materials. Fortunately, the resilience and flexibility of the US oil & gas and chemicals sector have allowed an increase in exports of the most disrupted commodities, offering a significant (although incomplete) measure of relief for consumers around the globe.

This response has confirmed a development approach to the US petroleum complex that has emphasized producing energy sufficient to meet the requirements of a growing economy, operating efficiently to ensure affordability and redirecting flows to those areas of greatest need. In short, the system worked.


The data behind record production


But past performance does not guarantee future results. The uplift from prices to companies throughout the US sector might mask the complexity of the challenge to maintain and even expand the resilience demonstrated or to export the gains pioneered in the development of US resources to other jurisdictions. US petroleum sector leaders arrived at their positions by strategically addressing their approach to capital allocation and process efficiency; similar approaches to planning and execution will be required as US upstream production matures, and exploration and development in new jurisdictions becomes more of a focus of the industry.

Consolidation synergies drive gains in cost reduction

A better look at the challenges facing the US sector can be seen by looking at performance in 2025, when US crude and natural gas production remained at elevated levels but prices slumped amid rising concerns over current and future demand. The results of the 2026 EY US oil and gas reserves and production benchmarking study underscores that the industry leaders maintained healthy profitability in these market conditions. Total revenues for the group of the top 30 operators in the US increased just about 7% year-over-year, but with overall costs rising even more quickly, pre-tax profits fell around 2% compared with 2024.

This is the lowest pre-tax net profitability of the group since 2021, although on a per barrel of oil equivalent (boe) basis, the price differential between 2024 and 2025 accounts for all but $0.76 of the difference as per boe production costs also fell to their lowest levels since 2021.

 

Much of this success in improving cost performance has been as a result of consolidation in the sector. And going beyond the annual study results, EY teams’ experience in the field bears this out.

 

Jarrett Link, EY Upstream Leader for Oil & Gas and Chemicals, pointed to his team’s work integrating upstream operations following a recent major acquisition. The work entailed integrating and transforming upstream operations, including standardizing processes across production operations, maintenance, water and power management, and remote operations capabilities.

“By designing future-state operating models, scaling centralized remote operations, and modernizing power and control room capabilities, we helped unlock billions of dollars in value through improved uptime, costs, safety, resilience and operational efficiency,” he said.

Ben Williams, EY Global Consulting Leader for Oil & Gas and Chemicals, sees similar results being achieved in digital as well as physical assets. A former CIO working in the US unconventional space, Ben understands the challenges the mergers bring to enterprises. “The surprise is the scale of synergies that we have seen achieved, often a multiple of what was originally deemed viable,” he said.


EY teams were hands-on when two legacy organizations needed to combine operations at industrial scale without disrupting production. By bringing together both operating models and data and core enterprise systems, the combined company was able to remove silos and manual processes while harmonizing workflows across drilling and production growth. What drove the synergies far exceeding expectations in this combination was an ability to move beyond system integration to a full operating model transformation that used integrated and governed data on a coherent platform to align planning, operations, land, accounting and commercial execution.

Exploration, or new plays, coming back into fashion?

All oil and gas companies will likely benefit from the rise in prices in 2026, but those that have better integrated their physical operations and their digital assets are building the foundation for continued strong performance across market conditions. And the EY production and reserves study also surfaces a key development that will likely put a greater emphasis on operational and cost excellence at the forefront of US oil and gas operations: a slight fall in end of year reported reserves.

 

Last year was not the first year that the reserves replacement ratio of these leading companies did not reach 1. But in 2023, the culprit was the market-related write-down of reserves. Last year stands out because it is the first time since at least 2021 that companies did not add more oil reserves through drilling and improved recovery than they lost through production. (US gas reserves continue to grow, with discoveries outpacing production.)

 

Compounding the problem is the rising cost of acquisition of reserves as the consolidation trend has also matured. For the Supermajors, proved reserves acquisition costs rose to over $21/boe in 2025, maintaining the sharp increase witnessed in 2024 M&A costs. Large independents and independents both saw a reduction in these costs, with large independents falling to below $8/boe, lower than both the three-year and five-year averages for this peer group. These rising costs suggest that companies will need to better plan their development of existing inventory and consider options in other jurisdictions, including frontier exploration.



Swapnil Bhadauria, EY Americas Oil & Gas and Chemicals Digital Operations Leader, and Greg Duffy, the developer of EY Capital Asset Planning and Scheduling (EYCAPS), see the potential for better planning to extend the life and productivity of existing inventory. They both drew from their experience wearing boots and hardhats and working in the field prior to joining the firm in thinking through practical solutions to the key problems affecting planning and operations.

“In practice, many operators still manage subsurface, drilling, facilities, production and capital data through disconnected systems and inconsistent definitions. Ontologies and semantic models can create a common language across these functions, allowing teams — and increasingly AI tools — to understand relationships between wells, reservoirs, facilities constraints, schedules, costs and production targets” says Bhadauria. “That connected view can help operators identify root causes more quickly when performance deviates from plan, whether the issue stems from subsurface assumptions, execution constraints, infrastructure bottlenecks, supply delays or capital sequencing.”

By building this foundation now, leading companies will be better positioned to capture value as AI frontier models evolve. A common semantic layer can help ensure that new AI capabilities are applied to the real relationships, constraints and trade-offs that shape upstream performance, enabling faster diagnosis, better scenario planning, more timely corrective action and greater business value from technology.


Spectrum line

Upstream operators lose significant capital due to fragmented planning, misaligned schedules and slow replanning cycles.


Building upon EY success in connecting this data across functions into one view, Greg Duffy oversaw the development of an integrated capital planning and scheduling platform that connects drilling, completions, facilities and infrastructure into one system.

“The faster planning this platform allows drives better asset utilization and greater capital efficiency without changing production targets,” said Duffy. Companies can achieve 15% efficiency gains with such an integrated approach to planning, which points toward an impetus for continued profitable growth even from maturing plays.

Tax-integrated frontier plays

But for some companies, the maturing US unconventional oil plays signal a need to look toward new or even frontier plays for exploration or new production areas. EY Americas Oil & Gas and Chemicals Tax Leader Greg Matlock notes that tax is often an afterthought in these decisions, but it should actually be front of mind. “Companies need to follow the geology but do so with a full understanding of the tax regime governing oil operations,” according to Matlock.

Successful projects combine financial modeling with proactive tax structuring and back-office operations. “Adopting a tax-integrated approach puts commerciality in the forefront of planning decisions, and accelerates funding readiness, lowers execution risk, while enabling scalable growth.”

This approach helps to significantly reduce the cost of entering new jurisdictions and also reduces the risks or adjustments necessary if exploration plays turn into commercial development projects, fueling the next round of corporate growth and global economic prosperity.

Summary

Record production in 2025 has reinforced the strength and resilience of the US oil and gas sector, but reserve replacement pressures and maturing portfolios are shifting the focus toward operational performance, capital efficiency and long-term value creation. Companies that successfully integrate planning, data and execution will be better positioned for the next phase of growth.

About this article

Authors

Related articles

Trade policy and the 2026 redesign of critical mineral supply chains

Learn how trade policy is reshaping critical mineral supply chains in 2026, with new frameworks, market tools and rising stakes for business.

Reimagining the Oil & Gas capital projects framework

Learn how Oil & Gas companies can improve capital project outcomes through stronger front-end planning, adaptive delivery models and risk discipline.

How data strategy can activate AI’s fit with oil and gas tax functions

AI can transform oil and gas tax — if data, skills and operating models align. Learn a three-pillar roadmap to scale AI responsibly and unlock insight.

How to navigate the next phase of federal energy tax policy

As federal energy tax rules evolve, companies must weigh near-term constraints against longer-term investment decisions. Read more.

Four imperatives shaping digital transformation for energy CDOs and CIOs

Digital change is redefining energy leadership. Learn how four imperatives help energy CDOs and CIOs link tech investments to measurable business outcomes.

The COO’s new agenda: Future-proofing oil & gas and chemicals assets

Leading COOs are reshaping operations by integrating technology, workforce and ecosystem partnerships to drive resilience, performance and value.